|
On March 7, 2003 The SCO Group filed suit against IBM,
claiming it improperly inserted proprietary Unix code in the Linux
kernel. The suit has evolved into a full-blown controversy. SCO's
lawyers are threatening to make the case a test of the validity of the
Free Software Foundation's General Public License (GPL), under which
the Linux kernel and the GNU programs that make up the Linux operating
system are distributed. Were SCO to prevail, it might hinder
development of Linux and make the general public's ability to obtain
it difficult. It could also have an adverse effect on other Open
Source projects which are developed and distributed in ways that are
similar to the Linux model. Since SCO is threatening to charge
exorbitant licensing fees for Linux, this would be a serious blow to
developing nations particularly. Their fledgling IT industries rely on
Linux to a great extent in their efforts to overcome a technological
lag which contributes to the cycle of poverty. Though most experts in
the Linux, Open Source and Free Software communities believe SCO's
claims dubious, their evidence flimsy and their chances for success
slim, the case has managed to divert the attention of the entire IT
industry. It has many in these communities understandably worried.
As a service to our visitors, Linux Online has devoted a section of
our news area to provide more information about the SCO's lawsuit
against IBM and other events related to the SCO controversy.
-
SCO Timeline
A summary of the events in the case which we will update as important
developments arise.
-
SCO Controversy glossary and who's who
A glossary of sorts to provide our visitors with more information about the terms we use and the people we refer to in our timeline
-
News Stories
Stories about the SCO controversy posted to our news section.
-
Commentary
Op-Ed pieces and interviews related to SCO posted
at Linux Online
-
Related Links
Links to pages with more information about SCO
|